GHSA-3cx6-j9j4-54mp CVE-2025-65017
Decidim's private data exports can lead to data leaks
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.31%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 24.28% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- CWE-703 Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions
- Fix
- Available
- 2 packages have a fixed version
Description
Impact
Private data exports can lead to data leaks in cases where the UUID generation causes collisions for the generated UUIDs.
The bug was introduced by #13571 and affects Decidim versions 0.30.0 or newer (currently 2025-09-23).
This issue was discovered by running the following spec several times in a row, as it can randomly fail due to this bug:
$ cd decidim-core
$ for i in {1..10}; do bundle exec rspec spec/jobs/decidim/download_your_data_export_job_spec.rb -e "deletes the" || break ; done
Run the spec as many times as needed to hit a UUID that converts to 0 through .to_i.
The UUID to zero conversion does not cause a security issue but the security issue is demonstrated with the following example.
The following code regenerates the issue by assigning a predefined UUID that will generate a collision (example assumes there are already two existing users in the system):
# Create the ZIP buffers to be stored
buffer1 = Zip::OutputStream.write_buffer do |out|
out.put_next_entry("admin.txt")
out.write "Hello, admin!"
end
buffer1.rewind
buffer2 = Zip::OutputStream.write_buffer do |out|
out.put_next_entry("user.txt")
out.write "Hello, user!"
end
buffer2.rewind
# Create the private exports with a predefined IDs
user1 = Decidim::User.find(1)
export = user1.private_exports.build
export.id = "0210ae70-482b-4671-b758-35e13e0097a9"
export.export_type = "download_your_data"
export.file.attach(io: buffer1, filename: "foobar.zip", content_type: "application/zip")
export.expires_at = Decidim.download_your_data_expiry_time.from_now
export.metadata = {}
export.save!
user2 = Decidim::User.find(2)
export = user2.private_exports.build
export.id = "0210d2df-a0c7-40aa-ad97-2dae5083e3b8"
export.export_type = "download_your_data"
export.file.attach(io: buffer2, filename: "foobar.zip", content_type: "application/zip")
export.expires_at = Decidim.download_your_data_expiry_time.from_now
export.metadata = {}
export.save!
Expect to see an error in the situation.
Now, login as user with ID 1, go to /download_your_data, click "Download file" from the export and expect to see the data that should be attached to user with ID 2. This is an artificially replicated situation with the predefined UUIDs but it can easily happen in real situations.
The reason for the test case failure can be replicated in case you change the export ID to export.id = "e9540f96-9e3d-4abe-8c2a-6c338d85a684". This would return 0 through .to_s
After attaching that ID, you can test if the file is available for the export:
user.private_exports.last.file.attached?
=> false
user.private_exports.last.file.blob
=> nil
Note that this fails with such UUID as shown in the example and could easily lead to collisions in case the UUID starts with a number. E.g. UUID "0210ae70-482b-4671-b758-35e13e0097a9" would convert to 210 through .to_s. Therefore, if someone else has a "private" export with the prefixes "00000210", "0000210", "000210", "00210", "0210" or "210", that would cause a collision and the file could be attached to the wrong private export.
Theoretical chance of collision (the reality depends on the UUID generation algorithm):
- Potential combinations of the UUID first part (8 characters hex): 16^8
- Potentially colliding character combinations (8 numbers characters in the range of 0-9): 10^8
- 10^8 / 16^8 ≈ 2.3% (23 / 1000 users)
The root cause is that the class Decidim::PrivateExport defines an ActiveStorage relation to file and the table active_storage_attachments stores the related record_id as bigint which causes the conversion to happen.
Workarounds
Fully disable the private exports feature until a patch is available.
Affected versions
RubyGems
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| decidim | >= 0.30.0, < 0.30.4 |
0.30.4 |
| decidim-core | >= 0.30.0, < 0.30.4 |
0.30.4 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
decidim RubyGems → 0.30.4
- bundler
bundle update decidim # Gemfile: gem "decidim", ">= 0.30.4"
decidim-core RubyGems → 0.30.4
- bundler
bundle update decidim-core # Gemfile: gem "decidim-core", ">= 0.30.4"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Passive
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- High
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 6.5
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
CWE-703: Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions
The product does not properly anticipate or handle exceptional conditions that rarely occur during normal operation of the product.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
- github.com/decidim/decidim/security/advisories/GHSA-3cx6-j9j4-54mp
- github.com/decidim/decidim/pull/13571
- github.com/decidim/decidim/releases/tag/v0.30.4
- github.com/decidim/decidim/releases/tag/v0.31.0
- github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/decidim-core/CVE-2025-6501…
- github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/decidim/CVE-2025-65017.yml
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-2g9c-vf8h-prxx Decidim: Push subscriptions can be abused for server-side requests | Medium | Also affects decidim-core |
| GHSA-533c-2vh9-4r86 Decidim: HTML content blocks allow stored script execution | Medium | Also affects decidim-core |
| GHSA-r3v7-5x4c-c69q Decidim: JWT-backed authentication can be replayed across organizations | High | Also affects decidim |
| GHSA-767h-63j4-5226 Decidim: Private exports can be downloaded through reusable links | Medium | Also affects decidim-core |
| GHSA-w5xj-99cg-rccm Decidim amendments can be accepted or rejected by anyone | Medium | Also affects decidim-core |
| GHSA-fc46-r95f-hq7g Decidim has a cross-site scripting (XSS) in user name | High | Also affects decidim-core |
| GHSA-cc4g-m3g7-xmw8 Decidim has a cross-site scripting vulnerability in the version control page | High | Also affects decidim |
| GHSA-vvqw-fqwx-mqmm Decidim::Admin vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) in the admin panel with QuillJS WYSWYG editor | Medium | Also affects decidim |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor