GHSA-387m-j3p9-3php CVE-2026-28358
NocoDB Vulnerable to User Enumeration via Password Reset Endpoint
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Medium · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.65%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 51.23% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-204 Observable Response Discrepancy
- Fix
0.301.3- Upgrade nocodb to this version or later
Description
Summary
The password forgot endpoint returned different responses for registered and unregistered emails, allowing user enumeration.
Details
POST /api/v2/auth/password/forgot returned a success message for registered emails but 'Your email has not been registered.' for unknown emails. The fix returns a uniform response regardless of whether the email exists.
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can determine whether an email is registered. No credentials or data are exposed.
Credit
This issue was reported by @Tulgaaaaaaaa.
Affected versions
npm
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| nocodb | < 0.301.3 |
0.301.3 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
nocodb npm → 0.301.3
- npm
npm install nocodb@0.301.3- yarn
yarn add nocodb@0.301.3- pnpm
pnpm add nocodb@0.301.3
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- Low
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- None
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
- Exploit maturity
- Unreported
CVSS 3.1 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-204: Observable Response Discrepancy
The product provides different responses to incoming requests in a way that reveals internal state information to an unauthorized actor outside of the intended control sphere.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
- Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-hmcr-rmjq-47qr NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Import Endpoint | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-h6vv-pcq8-7xm4 NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Base Migration URL | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-6mhr-74x2-98v9 NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Secure Attachment | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-r989-7g3j-wjhw NocoDB: Refresh Tokens Persist Through Password Recovery | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-gprh-27j3-g5h4 NocoDB: Server-Side Request Forgery via Spreadsheet Fetch URL | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-g72g-r7m4-9x4g NocoDB: OAuth Tokens Persist Through Security Events | Medium | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-xxpj-q764-9r6q NocoDB: Missing Ownership Check in MCP Attachment Read | Low | Also affects nocodb |
| GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Form View Redirect URL | High | Also affects nocodb |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor