Skip to content

GHSA-36hh-v3qg-5jq4 RUSTSEC-2026-0176

PyO3 has an Out-of-bounds Read in `nth` / `nth_back` for `PyList` and `PyTuple` iterators

High crates.io
Severity
0.0 / 10
High · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
—
No score published
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-125 Out-of-bounds Read
Fix
0.29.0
Upgrade pyo3 to this version or later

Description

PyO3 0.24.0 added optimized implementations of Iterator::nth and DoubleEndedIterator::nth_back for the BoundListIterator and BoundTupleIterator types. These implementations computed the target index using unchecked usize addition (index + n) before bounds-checking against the sequence length, then read the element via get_item_unchecked.

In nth methods, a sufficiently large n (combined with a non-zero internal index) could cause the addition to overflow and wrap around, producing a small "target index" that passed the bounds check and enabling reads at the front of the list or tuple of elements previously yielded by the iterator.

In nth_back methods, a sufficiently large n could cause underflow in a similar fashion, however would instead allow reads of arbitrary memory past the end of the list or tuple storage.

Affected versions

crates.io

PackageVulnerableFixed in
pyo3
< 0.29.0
0.29.0
pyo3
>= 0.24.0, < 0.29.0
0.29.0

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

pyo3 crates.io → 0.29.0

cargo
cargo update -p pyo3 --precise 0.29.0

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read

The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. To reduce the likelihood of introducing an out-of-bounds read, ensure that you validate and ensure correct calculations for any length argument, buffer size calculation, or offset. Be especially careful of relying on a sentinel (i.e. special character such as NUL) in untrusted inputs.
  • Architecture and Design: Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-chgr-c6px-7xpp
PyO3 has a missing `Sync` bound on `PyCFunction::new_closure` closures
Medium Also affects pyo3
GHSA-47qc-857f-7w7f
PyO3 has type confusion when accessing data from sublasses of subclasses of native types with `abi3` feature
High Also affects pyo3
GHSA-pph8-gcv7-4qj5
PyO3 Risk of buffer overflow in `PyString::from_object`
Low Also affects pyo3
GHSA-vxcf-c7mx-pg53
Build corruption when using `PYO3_CONFIG_FILE` environment variable
Medium Also affects pyo3
GHSA-6jgw-rgmm-7cv6
PyO3 has a risk of use-after-free in `borrowed` reads from Python weak references
Medium Also affects pyo3
GHSA-2vx6-fcw6-hpr6
Reference counting error in pyo3
Medium Also affects pyo3
GHSA-9v9v-9qvf-h2hj
Pillow: Heap over-read in WMF/EMF rendering via 16-bit dimension truncation (Windows builds)
High Same weakness, CWE-125
GHSA-v9pv-5gc8-w2m6
Pillow multi-frame loaders can reuse stale native image storage after mode transitions
Critical Same weakness, CWE-125
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor