Skip to content

GHSA-2v3w-6g35-5f9v CVE-2026-25783 GO-2026-4725

Mattermost fails to properly validate User-Agent header tokens

Medium Go
Severity
4.3 / 10
Medium · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.30%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 22.33% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-1287 Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Mattermost versions 11.3.x <= 11.3.0, 11.2.x <= 11.2.2, 10.11.x <= 10.11.10 fail to properly validate User-Agent header tokens which allows an authenticated attacker to cause a request panic via a specially crafted User-Agent header. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00586

Affected versions

Go

PackageVulnerableFixed in
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
< 5.3.2-0.20260129181235-1346cf529aef
5.3.2-0.20260129181235-1346cf529aef
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
>= 10.11.0-rc1, < 10.11.11
10.11.11
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
>= 11.2.0-rc1, < 11.2.3
11.2.3
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
>= 11.3.0-rc1, < 11.3.1
11.3.1
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
>= 10.11.0-rc1+incompatible, < 10.11.11+incompatible
>= 11.2.0-rc1+incompatible, < 11.2.3+incompatible
>= 11.3.0-rc1+incompatible, < 11.3.1+incompatible
10.11.11+incompatible
11.2.3+incompatible
11.3.1+incompatible
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server/v5
all versions
No fix yet
github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server/v6
all versions
No fix yet
github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8
< 8.0.0-20260129181235-1346cf529aef
8.0.0-20260129181235-1346cf529aef

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server Go → 5.3.2-0.20260129181235-1346cf529aef

go
go get github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server@v5.3.2-0.20260129181235-1346cf529aef && go mod tidy

github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8 Go → 8.0.0-20260129181235-1346cf529aef

go
go get github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/v8@v8.0.0-20260129181235-1346cf529aef && go mod tidy

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 4.3

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

Weakness

CWE-1287: Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input

The product receives input that is expected to be of a certain type, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input is actually of the expected type.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, "boat" may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as "red" or "blue." Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-xmfh-3ccg-c9fx
Mattermost has an Incorrect Authorization issue
Low Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
GHSA-h998-hxxj-8q83
Mattermost doesn't invalidate cached authentication state for active WebSocket connections during global session revocation
Medium Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
GHSA-g5vr-6pgg-74qv
Mattermost doesn't enforce bot-specific permission checks on the user active status endpoint
Low Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
GHSA-jqgv-39mg-7c2r
Mattermost doesn't authenticate Atlassian Connect installed callbacks, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to inject a rogue sharedSecret
Medium Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
GHSA-mxq2-5jpg-7474
Mattermost doesn't validate channel ownership of an existing subscription before applying edits
Medium Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
GHSA-2g8v-grq3-hq2g
Mattermost doesn't enforce administrator authorization on the {{setDefaultInstance}} call within the {{/gitlab connect}} command handler
Medium Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
Mattermost doesn't require role-management authorization when setting the scheme_admin flag on group syncable link and patch endpoints
High Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
Mattermost doesn't sanitize the Remote Cluster API response on PATCH operations
Medium Also affects github.com/mattermost/mattermost-server
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor