Skip to content

GHSA-2cww-fgmg-4jqc CVE-2024-3656

Keycloak's admin API allows low privilege users to use administrative functions

High Maven
Severity
8.1 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
3.32%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 88.60% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management
CWE-284 Improper Access Control
Fix
24.0.5
Upgrade org.keycloak:keycloak-services to this version or later

Description

Users with low privileges (just plain users in the realm) are able to utilize administrative functionalities within Keycloak admin interface. This issue presents a significant security risk as it allows unauthorized users to perform actions reserved for administrators, potentially leading to data breaches or system compromise.

Acknowledgements: Special thanks to Maurizio Agazzini for reporting this issue and helping us improve our project.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.keycloak:keycloak-services
< 24.0.5
24.0.5

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.keycloak:keycloak-services Maven → 24.0.5

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.keycloak</groupId><artifactId>keycloak-services</artifactId><version>24.0.5</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.keycloak:keycloak-services:24.0.5")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 8.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Weakness

CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor

The product exposes sensitive information to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

CWE-269: Improper Privilege Management

The product does not properly assign, modify, track, or check privileges for an actor, creating an unintended sphere of control for that actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Follow the principle of least privilege when assigning access rights to entities in a software system.
  • Architecture and Design: Consider following the principle of separation of privilege. Require multiple conditions to be met before permitting access to a system resource.

CWE-284: Improper Access Control

The product does not restrict or incorrectly restricts access to a resource from an unauthorized actor.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
  • Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-v3f7-2p4r-mwfw
Keycloak vulnerable to cross-site scripting (xss) via case-insensitive uri validation bypass
High Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-9jrw-8xf7-xqhq
Keycloak vulnerable to information disclosure through arbitrary filesystem path probing
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-w3p3-7cjg-vgfw
Keycloak allows unauthorized access to resources via uma permission ticket bypass
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-f5p5-6xmx-p252
Keycloak vulnerable to authorization bypass via incorrect uri comparison
High Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-r7rc-c989-86g6
Keycloak: Attacker can re-enable and take over disabled clients via registration access token
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-4gv3-mc9p-5wqc
Keycloak: Unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass
Critical Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-6g26-7cx5-mrrg
Keycloak: Information disclosure due to user profile permission bypass
Low Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
GHSA-cpf7-j4cf-vqx4
Keycloak has an Out-of-bounds Read
Medium Also affects org.keycloak:keycloak-services
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor