GHSA-279j-x4gx-hfrh CVE-2024-47871 PYSEC-2024-219
Gradio uses insecure communication between the FRP client and server
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- Critical · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.18%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 7.09% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-311 Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
- Fix
5.0.0- Upgrade gradio to this version or later
Description
Impact
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?
This vulnerability involves insecure communication between the FRP (Fast Reverse Proxy) client and server when Gradio's share=True option is used. HTTPS is not enforced on the connection, allowing attackers to intercept and read files uploaded to the Gradio server, as well as modify responses or data sent between the client and server. This impacts users who are sharing Gradio demos publicly over the internet using share=True without proper encryption, exposing sensitive data to potential eavesdroppers.
Patches
Yes, please upgrade to gradio>=5 to address this issue.
Workarounds
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
As a workaround, users can avoid using share=True in production environments and instead host their Gradio applications on servers with HTTPS enabled to ensure secure communication.
Affected versions
PyPI
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| gradio | < 5.0.0 |
5.0.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
gradio PyPI → 5.0.0
- pip
pip install --upgrade "gradio>=5.0.0"- poetry
poetry add "gradio>=5.0.0"- uv
uv add "gradio>=5.0.0"
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
CVSS 3.1 8.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Weakness
CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
The product does not encrypt sensitive or critical information before storage or transmission.
How to prevent it
- Requirements: Clearly specify which data or resources are valuable enough that they should be protected by encryption. Require that any transmission or storage of this data/resource should use well-vetted encryption algorithms.
- Architecture and Design: Ensure that encryption is properly integrated into the system design, including but not necessarily limited to: Encryption that is needed to store or transmit private data of the users of the system Encryption that is needed to protect the system itself from unauthorized disclosure or tampering Identify the separate needs and contexts for encryption: One-way (i.e., only the user or recipient needs to have the key). This can be achieved using public key cryptography, or other techniques in which the encrypting party (i.e., the product) does not need to have access to a private key. Two-way (i.e., the encryption can be automatically performed on behalf of a user, but the key must be available so that the plaintext can be automatically recoverable by that user). This requires storage of the private key in a format that is recoverable only by the user (or perhaps by the operating system) in a way that cannot be recovered by others. Using threat modeling or other techniques, assume that data can be compromised through a separate vulnerability or weakness, and determine where encryption will be most effective. Ensure that data that should be private is not being inadvertently exposed using weaknesses such as insecure permissions (CWE-732). [REF-7]
- Architecture and Design: When there is a need to store or transmit sensitive data, use strong, up-to-date cryptographic algorithms to encrypt that data. Select a well-vetted algorithm that is currently considered to be strong by experts in the field, and use well-tested implementations. As with all cryptographic mechanisms, the source code should be available for analysis. For example, US government systems require FIPS 140-2 certification. Do not develop custom or private cryptographic algorithms. They will likely be exposed to attacks that are well-understood by cryptographers. Reverse engineering techniques are mature. If the algorithm can be compromised if attackers find out how it works, then it is especially weak. Periodically ensure that the cryptography has not become obsolete. Some older algorithms, once thought to require a billion years of computing time, can now be broken in days or hours. This includes MD4, MD5, SHA1, DES, and other algorithms that were once regarded as strong. [REF-267]
- Architecture and Design: Compartmentalize the system to have "safe" areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.
- Implementation, Architecture and Design: When using industry-approved techniques, use them correctly. Don't cut corners by skipping resource-intensive steps (CWE-325). These steps are often essential for preventing common attacks.
- Implementation: Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
References
Advisories
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| GHSA-j36p-7w88-g82j Gradio FileExplorer preprocess path traversal allows files outside root_dir to reach callbacks | High | Also affects gradio |
| GHSA-6655-8ph2-63j3 Gradio: Audio cache key ignores metadata when saving numpy audio outputs | Low | Also affects gradio |
| GHSA-7hp7-4p35-3cx2 Gradio contains a cookie injection vulnerability | Medium | Also affects gradio |
| GHSA-jmh7-g254-2cq9 Gradio has SSRF via Malicious `proxy_url` Injection in `gr.load()` Config Processing | High | Also affects gradio |
| GHSA-pfjf-5gxr-995x Gradio has an Open Redirect in its OAuth Flow | Medium | Also affects gradio |
| GHSA-39mp-8hj3-5c49 Gradio is Vulnerable to Absolute Path Traversal on Windows with Python 3.13+ | High | Also affects gradio |
| GHSA-h3h8-3v2v-rg7m Gradio: Mocked OAuth Login Exposes Server Credentials and Uses Hardcoded Session Secret | Medium | Also affects gradio |
| GHSA-8jw3-6x8j-v96g Gradio Allows Unauthorized File Copy via Path Manipulation | High | Also affects gradio |
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor