Skip to content

GHSA-25xr-qj8w-c4vf BIT-tomcat-2025-53506 CVE-2025-53506

Apache Tomcat Coyote vulnerable to Denial of Service via excessive HTTP/2 streams

High Maven
Severity
7.5 / 10
High · CVSS 3.1
Exploit chance (EPSS)
2.13%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 81.95% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Fix
Available
2 packages have a fixed version

Description

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache Tomcat if an HTTP/2 client did not acknowledge the initial settings frame that reduces the maximum permitted concurrent streams.

This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.8, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.42, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.106. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.9, 10.1.43 or 9.0.107, which fix the issue.

Affected versions

Maven

PackageVulnerableFixed in
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100
No fix yet
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107
9.0.107
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43
10.1.43
org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
>= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9
11.0.9
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote
>= 11.0.0-M1, < 11.0.9
11.0.9
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote
>= 10.1.0-M1, < 10.1.43
10.1.43
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote
>= 9.0.0.M1, < 9.0.107
9.0.107
org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote
>= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100
No fix yet

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core Maven → 9.0.107

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat.embed</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-embed-core</artifactId><version>9.0.107</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core:9.0.107")

org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote Maven → 11.0.9

maven
<dependency><groupId>org.apache.tomcat</groupId><artifactId>tomcat-coyote</artifactId><version>11.0.9</version></dependency>
gradle
implementation("org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote:11.0.9")

Severity breakdown

CVSS 3.1 7.5

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Weakness

CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Design throttling mechanisms into the system architecture. The best protection is to limit the amount of resources that an unauthorized user can cause to be expended. A strong authentication and access control model will help prevent such attacks from occurring in the first place. The login application should be protected against DoS attacks as much as possible. Limiting the database access, perhaps by caching result sets, can help minimize the resources expended. To further limit the potential for a DoS attack, consider tracking the rate of requests received from users and blocking requests that exceed a defined rate threshold.
  • Architecture and Design: Mitigation of resource exhaustion attacks requires that the target system either: recognizes the attack and denies that user further access for a given amount of time, or uniformly throttles all requests in order to make it more difficult to consume resources more quickly than they can again be freed. The first of these solutions is an issue in itself though, since it may allow attackers to prevent the use of the system by a particular valid user. If the attacker impersonates the valid user, they may be able to prevent the user from accessing the server in question. The second solution is simply difficult to effectively institute -- and even when properly done, it does not provide a full solution. It simply makes the attack require more resources on the part of the attacker.
  • Architecture and Design: Ensure that protocols have specific limits of scale placed on them.
  • Implementation: Ensure that all failures in resource allocation place the system into a safe posture.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
GHSA-83qj-6fr2-vhqg
Apache Tomcat: Potential RCE and/or information disclosure and/or information corruption with partial PUT
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3
HTTP/2 Stream Cancellation Attack
Medium Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-xjgh-84hx-56c5
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type Apache Tomcat
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
CVE-2020-1938
Improper Privilege Management in Tomcat
Critical Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-pjfr-qf3p-3q25
When running Apache Tomcat on Windows with HTTP PUTs enabled it was possible to upload a JSP file to the server
High Known exploited Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-h3x4-894j-xpx5
Apache Tomcat's FORM authentication process has an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-9xv2-5v5q-p794
Apache Tomcat's DIGEST authenticator has an Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay vulnerability
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
GHSA-f525-44xv-f2qj
Apache Tomcat - HTTP/2 no-authority bypass of strict SNI validation
Critical Also affects org.apache.tomcat.embed:tomcat-embed-core
Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor