Skip to content

EEF-CVE-2026-65633 CVE-2026-65633 GHSA-6vcj-3h59-rrc3

Purpose-limited JWT accepted as full bearer authentication in AshAuthentication

Not rated yet Hex
Severity
0.0 / 10
Unknown · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.58%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 47.82% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-287 Improper Authentication
Fix
5.0.0-rc.13
Upgrade ash_authentication to this version or later

Description

Summary

Improper Authentication vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows purpose-limited JWTs to be replayed as full bearer API credentials when a resource uses stateless bearer-token verification.

The bearer-token authentication helper AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_bearer/3 verifies an Authorization: Bearer JWT's signature and rejects tokens containing an act claim, but performs no check that the token's purpose claim equals user at the bearer boundary. When the resource is configured with require_token_presence_for_authentication?: false (the DSL default), the follow-on validate_token/3 helper returns {:ok, nil} without consulting the token resource, so no downstream check on purpose takes place either. As a result, any valid, non-expired JWT the library itself issued for a narrow, single-purpose flow (most notably the purpose: sign_in token that WebAuthn always emits during sign-in, and that the Password strategy emits when sign-in tokens are enabled) is accepted directly as a general-purpose bearer credential and resolves to a full current_user assignment.

This bypasses the library's intended token-exchange contract, in which the sign_in token is meant to be presented exactly once to a preparation that validates the purpose claim and immediately revokes the token. The first use of a still-valid sign-in token presented directly in the Authorization header succeeds because the stateless bearer path never scopes it to purpose == "user".

An attacker who obtains a not-yet-exchanged sign-in token for a target subject (for example via log or referrer leakage, an intercepted magic-link delivery channel, or a partially compromised intermediary) can present it as a bearer token and be authenticated as that subject, fully bypassing the intended one-time-use and revocation semantics. Exploitation additionally requires that the host application wire up retrieve_from_bearer/3 on a reachable route and uses either WebAuthn (sign-in tokens are always issued) or the Password strategy with sign_in_tokens_enabled?: true. Resources configured with require_token_presence_for_authentication?: true (including applications scaffolded by the Igniter installer since v4.5.0) and the session-based path (authenticate_resource_from_session/4) enforce purpose == "user" against the stored token record and are not affected.

This issue affects ash_authentication: from 3.10.5 before 4.14.2 and from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.13.

Configurations

The bypass is reachable only when a resource uses stateless bearer-token verification, i.e. require_token_presence_for_authentication? is false (the DSL default). In that mode validate_token/3 returns {:ok, nil} without consulting the token resource, so the JWT's purpose claim is the only remaining scoping signal at the bearer boundary and it is never checked. When require_token_presence_for_authentication? is true, validate_token/3 looks the token up with get_token(%{"jti" => jti, "purpose" => "user"}); purpose-limited tokens are stored under their own purpose (sign_in, remember_me, ...), so that lookup fails and those tokens are rejected. Applications scaffolded by the Igniter installer since v4.5.0 default to require_token_presence_for_authentication?: true and are therefore not exposed as generated; applications configured manually or that deliberately opt into stateless JWT verification are.

Exploitation additionally requires the host application to wire up AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_bearer/3 on a route the attacker can reach, and to use a strategy that issues purpose-limited JWTs carrying a resolvable sub claim: either the WebAuthn strategy (sign-in tokens are always emitted, no opt-in required) or the Password strategy with sign_in_tokens_enabled?: true. The session-based path (authenticate_resource_from_session/4) already enforces purpose == "user" against the token resource and is not affected.

Affected versions

Hex

PackageVulnerableFixed in
ash_authentication
>= 3.10.5, < 4.14.2
>= 5.0.0-rc.0, < 5.0.0-rc.13
4.14.2
5.0.0-rc.13

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

ash_authentication Hex → 5.0.0-rc.13

mix
{:ash_authentication, "~> 5.0.0-rc.13"} # then: mix deps.update ash_authentication

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Passive
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
High
Integrity (vulnerable system)
High
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-287: Improper Authentication

When an actor claims to have a given identity, the product does not prove or insufficiently proves that the claim is correct.

How to prevent it
  • Architecture and Design: Use an authentication framework or library such as the OWASP ESAPI Authentication feature.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
EEF-CVE-2026-86688
Session id is not renewed on authentication in ash_authentication, allowing session fixation
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication
EEF-CVE-2026-76949
Remember-me sign-in guard reads a session key that is never written in ash_authentication, allowing session replacement
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication
EEF-CVE-2026-91039
dynamic_oidc identities are not namespaced by connection in ash_authentication, allowing cross-connection account takeover
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication
EEF-CVE-2026-88952
OAuth2 sign-in attached to an existing account without an email comparison in AshAuthentication
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication
EEF-CVE-2026-85500
`require_confirmed_with` is not enforced on the action and fails open on an unreadable attribute in AshAuthentication
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication
EEF-CVE-2026-86533
Revoked session accepted because the session jti is never checked in AshAuthentication and AshAuthentication Phoenix
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication
EEF-CVE-2026-81632
Single-use sign-in token placed in a redirect query string in AshAuthenticationPhoenix
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication
EEF-CVE-2026-80218
Sign-in token minted for one resource accepted by another in AshAuthentication
Not rated yet Also affects ash_authentication

Credits: EQSTLab, James Harton, Jonatan Männchen / EEF

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor