EEF-CVE-2026-48599 CVE-2026-48599 GHSA-mwr4-5g34-j5cq
Authorization bypass via path binding override in elixir-grpc/grpc HTTP transcoding
- Severity
- 0.0 / 10
- High · CVSS 4.0
- Exploit chance (EPSS)
- 0.34%
- Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 27.42% of scored vulnerabilities.
- Known exploited
- No
- Not in CISA's catalog
- Weakness
- CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
- Fix
1.0.0- Upgrade grpc to this version or later
Description
Summary
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in elixir-grpc grpc allows authenticated attackers to access or modify resources belonging to other users by smuggling a conflicting value for any path-bound field via the query string or request body.
In 'Elixir.GRPC.Server.Transcode':map_request/5 (lib/grpc/server/transcode.ex), all three clauses use Map.merge/2 with path bindings as the first argument, giving them the lowest merge precedence. A request such as GET /users/me/profile?user_id=victim (or a POST with {"user_id": "victim"} when body: "*") yields a decoded protobuf struct where the path-bound field carries the attacker-supplied value rather than the router-extracted value. Any handler that uses the path-bound field for authorization, multi-tenancy scoping, or ownership checks is silently bypassed.
This issue affects grpc: from 0.8.0 before 1.0.0.
Configurations
HTTP-to-gRPC transcoding must be enabled.
Affected versions
Hex
| Package | Vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| grpc | >= 0.8.0, < 1.0.0 |
1.0.0 |
How to fix
Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.
grpc Hex → 1.0.0
- mix
{:grpc, "~> 1.0.0"} # then: mix deps.update grpc
Severity breakdown
CVSS 4.0 0.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
- High
- Integrity (vulnerable system)
- High
- Availability (vulnerable system)
- None
- Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
- None
- Integrity (subsequent systems)
- None
- Availability (subsequent systems)
- None
Weakness
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data.
How to prevent it
- Architecture and Design: For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
- Architecture and Design, Implementation: Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
- Architecture and Design: Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
References
Advisories
Fixes and patches
Packages
Other links
Timeline
- Published
- Last updated by the source
- Latest EPSS score
Related advisories
| Advisory | Severity | Why it's related |
|---|---|---|
| EEF-CVE-2026-48853 Remote code execution and denial of service via unsafe Erlang term deserialization in elixir-grpc/grpc | Critical | Also affects grpc |
| EEF-CVE-2026-53430 grpc gzip decompression bomb in GRPC.Compressor.Gzip.decompress/1 | High | Also affects grpc |
| EEF-CVE-2026-48854 Unbounded request body accumulation causes memory exhaustion in elixir-grpc/grpc | High | Also affects grpc |
| GHSA-w3p3-7cjg-vgfw Keycloak allows unauthorized access to resources via uma permission ticket bypass | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-639 |
| EEF-CVE-2026-96581 An upsert on the primary key in Ash ignores attribute multitenancy, so one tenant can read, overwrite and take over another tenant's records | Not rated yet | Same weakness, CWE-639 |
| GHSA-vwwx-px9w-crrc ApostropheCMS: Missing Authorization on Notification PATCH/DELETE Endpoints | Low | Same weakness, CWE-639 |
| GHSA-2jrp-qc93-h2j8 ApostropheCMS: Same-parent page reorder in @apostrophecms/page move() re-ranks a restricted parent's children without create authorization | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-639 |
| GHSA-q6wp-fr43-gm9v Contao: Improper access control in the preview links module | Medium | Same weakness, CWE-639 |
Credits: Jonatan Männchen / EEF, Paulo Valente, Peter Ullrich
MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.
Check your repos with MergeHarbor