Skip to content

EEF-CVE-2026-105283 CVE-2026-105283 GHSA-7gxc-w225-f7f3

Internal error terms inspected into AshTypescript RPC error responses

Not rated yet Hex
Severity
0.0 / 10
Unknown · CVSS 4.0
Exploit chance (EPSS)
0.41%
Chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Higher than 35.52% of scored vulnerabilities.
Known exploited
No
Not in CISA's catalog
Weakness
CWE-209 Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Fix
0.19.1
Upgrade ash_typescript to this version or later

Description

Summary

Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthenticated attacker to read internal Elixir terms from an RPC error response by provoking an error the error builder has no dedicated clause for.

AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder.build_error_response/1 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/error_builder.ex renders a pipeline error term that matches no specific clause with inspect/1 and places the result in details.error of the client-facing error. Ash exceptions take a separate path in AshTypescript.Rpc.Errors where unhandled cases are redacted behind an errorId, but these fallbacks have no redaction, so whatever the term carries reaches the HTTP or channel response. Two request paths hand it such terms: a struct-typed action argument with an invalid nested value, where cast_map_to_struct/2 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/input_formatter.ex throws the raw Ash.Type cast error into the builder, and field selection on a generic action that returns a primitive, where format_field_type/1 inspects the full Ash.Info.Manifest.Type struct into vars.returnType. Resource module names in vars.resource are not treated as sensitive and are out of scope.

This issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.1.0 before 0.19.1.

Details

1. Error funnel. AshTypescript.Rpc.run_action/3 runs the request through Pipeline.parse_request/3, execute_ash_action/1 and process_result/2. Any {:error, reason} from these goes to error_response/1, which calls AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder.build_error_response/1 with the raw reason term.

2. Unredacted fallbacks. build_error_response/1 has clauses for the error tuples the pipeline is expected to emit. A two-tuple whose first element is an atom but matches no clause is rendered as field_validation_error with details.error set to inspect(error), and any other term becomes unknown_error with details.error set to inspect(other). Ash exceptions never reach these clauses because AshTypescript.Rpc.Errors handles them and redacts unhandled ones behind an errorId, so only this path has no redaction.

3. Reachable triggers. AshTypescript.Rpc.InputFormatter.cast_map_to_struct/2 throws the raw Ash.Type.cast_input/3 error, a keyword list, when a struct-typed argument fails to cast, and format/6 turns the throw into {:error, term} for the funnel. Separately, requesting fields on a generic action whose return type is a primitive produces an {:invalid_field_selection, :primitive_type, return_type, ...} tuple whose return_type is formatted by format_field_type/1, which inspects the whole Ash.Info.Manifest.Type struct, constraints and decoration included, into vars.returnType.

Proof of concept

  1. Expose an AshTypescript RPC action that takes a struct-typed argument, for example an assignee argument whose struct has a UUID id field.
  2. Send the action request with an invalid nested value, such as {"assignee": {"id": "not-a-uuid", "name": "x", "email": "e"}}.
  3. Read the response: each pair of the raw Ash.Type cast error is returned as its own field_validation_error with the inspected term in details.error.

For the second path, send a fields list to a generic action that returns a primitive and read the inspected Ash.Info.Manifest.Type struct in vars.returnType of the resulting error.

Impact

Any client able to call the RPC endpoint can submit malformed struct arguments or field selections and read internal Elixir terms, including any state the failing pipeline step carried, from the error response.

Configurations

The application exposes an AshTypescript RPC endpoint over HTTP or a channel and has an action with a struct-typed argument, or a generic action with a primitive return type that accepts field selection.

Affected versions

Hex

PackageVulnerableFixed in
ash_typescript
>= 0.1.0, < 0.19.1
0.19.1

How to fix

Move to the fixed version or later with your package manager, update the lockfile, and run your tests. If the package only arrives through another dependency, upgrade that dependency first. If none of its releases pulls a fixed version yet, force the version with your package manager's override.

ash_typescript Hex → 0.19.1

mix
{:ash_typescript, "~> 0.19.1"} # then: mix deps.update ash_typescript

Severity breakdown

CVSS 4.0 0.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
Present
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
Low
Integrity (vulnerable system)
None
Availability (vulnerable system)
None
Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
None
Integrity (subsequent systems)
None
Availability (subsequent systems)
None

Weakness

CWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information

The product generates an error message that includes sensitive information about its environment, users, or associated data.

How to prevent it
  • Implementation: Ensure that error messages only contain minimal details that are useful to the intended audience and no one else. The messages need to strike the balance between being too cryptic (which can confuse users) or being too detailed (which may reveal more than intended). The messages should not reveal the methods that were used to determine the error. Attackers can use detailed information to refine or optimize their original attack, thereby increasing their chances of success. If errors must be captured in some detail, record them in log messages, but consider what could occur if the log messages can be viewed by attackers. Highly sensitive information such as passwords should never be saved to log files. Avoid inconsistent messaging that might accidentally tip off an attacker about internal state, such as whether a user account exists or not.
  • Implementation: Handle exceptions internally and do not display errors containing potentially sensitive information to a user.
  • Implementation: Use naming conventions and strong types to make it easier to spot when sensitive data is being used. When creating structures, objects, or other complex entities, separate the sensitive and non-sensitive data as much as possible.
  • Implementation, Build and Compilation: Debugging information should not make its way into a production release.
  • Implementation, Build and Compilation: Debugging information should not make its way into a production release.
  • System Configuration: Where available, configure the environment to use less verbose error messages. For example, in PHP, disable the display_errors setting during configuration, or at runtime using the error_reporting() function.
  • System Configuration: Create default error pages or messages that do not leak any information.

References

Timeline

  1. Published
  2. Last updated by the source
  3. Latest EPSS score
AdvisorySeverityWhy it's related
EEF-CVE-2026-82731
Unescaped path parameters in AshTypescript generated TypeScript client allow request redirection
Not rated yet Also affects ash_typescript
EEF-CVE-2026-74837
Unbounded atom creation from client-supplied RPC field names in AshTypescript field formatter
Not rated yet Also affects ash_typescript
EEF-CVE-2026-82733
Route handler return value echoed into AshTypescript error response
Not rated yet Also affects ash_typescript
EEF-CVE-2026-82732
Declared argument constraints not enforced on AshTypescript typed controller routes
Not rated yet Also affects ash_typescript
EEF-CVE-2026-82730
Authorization-redacted field values disclosed through AshTypescript result normalization
Not rated yet Also affects ash_typescript
EEF-CVE-2026-77950
RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errors
Not rated yet Also affects ash_typescript
EEF-CVE-2026-77856
Unbounded atom creation from typed struct field names in AshTypescript field selector
Not rated yet Also affects ash_typescript
GHSA-vfpm-58rq-9qcg
Vite: First 4 bytes of files outside of `server.fs` setting is exposed by `?vite-wasm-instance`
Medium Same weakness, CWE-209

Credits: Jonatan Männchen / EEF, Peter Shoukry / Udin, Torkild Gundersen Kjevik / Ash Project

Is this in your code?

MergeHarbor checks every repository's dependencies against this database, ranks what matters by exploitability and reachability, routes it to the owning team and opens the fix pull request.

Check your repos with MergeHarbor